A popular counter-argument to my "the Bloc will deliberately ensure chaos ensues in all legislation while piling our cash into Quebec," is that "well, the Bloc aren't actually in the coalition." AHA!!! So these freaks think that it is "entirely constitutional" for the GG to hand over power to a coalition with 30 odd less seats that the Conservative caucus because the Bloc has said they will ensure they will prop it up in confidence votes for a year? How in the world does that ensure a stable government? It doesn't, it would be far more unstable because the grits will try to (wisely) alienate the NDP as much as possible from fiscal responsibilities. This of course will create tension and will ultimately lead to the implosion of the coalition.
I can understand my NDP peers getting blue balls now that they have never been closer to the prospect of power and the chance to finally close the gap of state and society but only 17% of people want that. This is after all, a democracy, have the courage to take it directly to the people. If you know that they won't like it, try changing some actual policy. Or you can continue celebrating each election with the ole 4th place finish. Just remember, you were put there by the people, I dare you to circumvent their choice, you will pay. There is nothing new about the way New Democrats do democracy, your apparently preferred way is done in several places around the world. Places where people who seek freedom and justice come here.